Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rving results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (15,552 of 21,723 topics). This Rving is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Rving
Topic details
Total words: 3,168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos