Topic summary
⁠36%3 analyzed articles/videos786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Road Rage results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 1,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,674 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (12,541 of 24,545 topics). This Road Rage is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Road Rage
Topic details
Total words: 3,674
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos