Topic summary
⁠20%2 analyzed articles/videos1,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Inspections results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Recency Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 524 hits. Analysis detected 1,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,904 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (16,845 of 22,261 topics). This Restaurant Inspections is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Restaurant Inspections
Topic details
Total words: 4,904
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos