Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Residency Requirements results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (17,456 of 22,919 topics). This Residency Requirements is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Residency Requirements
Topic details
Total words: 2,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos