Topic summary
⁠48%3 analyzed articles/videos2,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Research Grants results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,096 hits. Analysis detected 8,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,800 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (15,452 of 22,070 topics). This Research Grants is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Research Grants
Topic details
Total words: 10,800
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos