Author summary
66% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikhail Zinshteyn results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,575 hits . Analysis detected 10,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,428 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,389 of 8,594 authors). This Mikhail Zinshteyn is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Mikhail Zinshteyn
Author details
Total words: 13,428
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.7% 11.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst