Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos1,369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Issues results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 717 hits. Analysis detected 4,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,476 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (11,793 of 24,545 topics). This Regulatory Issues is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Regulatory Issues
Topic details
Total words: 5,476
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos