Topic summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Carpet results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Horn Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 1,089 hits . Analysis detected 3,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (4,470 of 23,162 topics). This Red Carpet is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Red Carpet
Topic details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.7% 30.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 24.7% 24.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Horn Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst