Topic summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reckless Driving results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,138 hits. Analysis detected 4,051 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (16,566 of 24,545 topics). This Reckless Driving is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Reckless Driving
Topic details
Total words: 7,624
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos