Topic summary
74% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recession results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 887 hits . Analysis detected 8,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,560 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 50% (10,923 of 21,675 topics). This Recession is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Recession
Topic details
Total words: 8,560
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst