Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ray Ban results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 421 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (7,378 of 23,538 topics). This Ray Ban is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Ray Ban
Topic details
Total words: 1,788
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos