Topic summary
⁠90%3 analyzed articles/videos807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Slurs results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 749 hits. Analysis detected 6,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,592 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (11,519 of 22,261 topics). This Racial Slurs is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Racial Slurs
Topic details
Total words: 5,592
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.4%13.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.6%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos