Topic summary
⁠98%4 analyzed articles/videos2,803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Politics results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 2,861 hits. Analysis detected 18,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,806 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,926 of 23,634 topics). This Racial Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Racial Politics
Topic details
Total words: 10,806
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.5%26.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.2%13.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos