Topic summary
74% 17 analyzed articles/videos 7,977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queens results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 4,117 hits . Analysis detected 28,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,460 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (17,467 of 24,545 topics). This Queens is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. Queens
Topic details
Total words: 33,460
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score17 analyzed articles33.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst