Topic summary
⁠43%3 analyzed articles/videos832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Qualified Immunity results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 1.6% saturation with 650 hits. Analysis detected 6,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,769 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (24,050 of 24,081 topics). This Qualified Immunity is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Qualified Immunity
Topic details
Total words: 41,769
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.1% percentile
0.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles41.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos