Topic summary
⁠73%3 analyzed articles/videos1,370 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Land Use results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,357 hits. Analysis detected 9,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,256 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,920 of 24,547 topics). This Public Land Use is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Public Land Use
Topic details
Total words: 10,256
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos