Topic summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos2,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Psilocybin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,111 hits. Analysis detected 7,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (18,139 of 24,545 topics). This Psilocybin is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Psilocybin
Topic details
Total words: 13,000
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos