Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video2,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Private Medical Practice results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 989 hits. Analysis detected 6,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (14,859 of 24,292 topics). This Private Medical Practice is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Private Medical Practice
Topic details
Total words: 9,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos