Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 2,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr Emma Jones results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 989 hits . Analysis detected 6,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 45% (5,255 of 9,503 authors). This Dr Emma Jones is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Dr Emma Jones
Author details
Total words: 9,396
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst