Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prince Harry And Meghan Markle results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 3,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (6,577 of 22,971 topics). This Prince Harry And Meghan Markle is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Prince Harry And Meghan Markle
Topic details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos