Topic summary
⁠80%5 analyzed articles/videos3,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pricing results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 939 hits. Analysis detected 11,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,304 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (13,168 of 22,261 topics). This Pricing is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Pricing
Topic details
Total words: 13,304
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos