Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video1,073 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Portland Business results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 980 hits. Analysis detected 5,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (6,563 of 24,501 topics). This Portland Business is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Portland Business
Topic details
Total words: 4,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.8%22.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos