Topic summary
88% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Polling results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 3,349 hits . Analysis detected 15,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,496 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,555 of 22,978 topics). This Polling is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Polling
Topic details
Total words: 14,496
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 23.1% 23.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst