Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Interviews results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 567 hits. Analysis detected 4,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,208 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (12,271 of 21,946 topics). This Political Interviews is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Political Interviews
Topic details
Total words: 5,208
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos