Topic summary
⁠20%2 analyzed articles/videos1,067 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Health results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 209 hits. Analysis detected 1,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (20,319 of 24,564 topics). This Player Health is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Player Health
Topic details
Total words: 4,268
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos