Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Analysis results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 741 hits. Analysis detected 3,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (12,115 of 24,545 topics). This Player Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Player Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 5,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos