Author summary
40% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,460 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Aaronson results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,608 hits . Analysis detected 14,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,840 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,745 of 9,116 authors). This Adam Aaronson is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Adam Aaronson
Author details
Total words: 25,840
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst