Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video1,177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Perdida De Prestaciones Snap results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 2,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (11,611 of 24,572 topics). This Perdida De Prestaciones Snap is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Perdida De Prestaciones Snap
Topic details
Total words: 4,708
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos