Author summary
45% 7 analyzed articles/videos 8,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Parra results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 1,791 hits . Analysis detected 16,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,024 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,615 of 8,943 authors). This Daniel Parra is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Daniel Parra
Author details
Total words: 32,024
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles32K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.0% 0.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst