Topic summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peer Support results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 458 hits . Analysis detected 3,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,500 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 57% (10,767 of 24,658 topics). This Peer Support is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Peer Support
Topic details
Total words: 3,500
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst