Topic summary
83% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Process results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,672 hits . Analysis detected 13,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,168 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (16,804 of 24,470 topics). This Peace Process is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Peace Process
Topic details
Total words: 16,168
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst