Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video3,626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parameters results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,354 hits. Analysis detected 10,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (15,198 of 21,862 topics). This Parameters is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Parameters
Topic details
Total words: 14,504
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos