Topic summary
81%8 analyzed articles/videos6,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palestine results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 3,638 hits. Analysis detected 30,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,638 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 43% (14,226 of 24,569 topics). This Palestine is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles29.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate