Topic summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orbital Mechanics results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 1,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (16,103 of 23,764 topics). This Orbital Mechanics is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Orbital Mechanics
Topic details
Total words: 3,268
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos