Topic summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos1,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olympic Games results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 540 hits. Analysis detected 6,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,240 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (12,700 of 22,841 topics). This Olympic Games is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Olympic Games
Topic details
Total words: 7,240
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.7%4.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos