Author summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Faith Fernandez results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 536 hits . Analysis detected 2,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,660 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,639 of 9,296 authors). This Faith Fernandez is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Faith Fernandez
Author details
Total words: 2,660
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.4% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.6% 13.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 20.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst