Topic summary
80% 32 analyzed articles/videos 18,729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Weapons results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 8,558 hits . Analysis detected 69,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 104,095 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 10% (20,346 of 22,433 topics). This Nuclear Weapons is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Nuclear Weapons
Topic details
Total words: 104,095
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score32 analyzed articles104.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst