Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nova Corps results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 1,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (5,711 of 24,716 topics). This Nova Corps is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Nova Corps
Topic details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.1%17.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos