Topic summary
⁠92%5 analyzed articles/videos4,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofit Funding results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,793 hits. Analysis detected 15,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,198 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (16,089 of 23,773 topics). This Nonprofit Funding is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Nonprofit Funding

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos