Author summary
ā 79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grist Creative results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 966 hits . Analysis detected 4,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ā 61% (3,747 of 9,470 authors). This Grist Creative is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Grist Creative
Author details
Total words: 5,100
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Author 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 18.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst