Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video1,692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York State Economy results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 437 hits. Analysis detected 2,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (9,922 of 24,490 topics). This New York State Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
New York State Economy
Topic details
Total words: 5,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos