Topic summary
78% 18 analyzed articles/videos 19,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neuroscience results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 5,333 hits . Analysis detected 56,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 76,154 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (19,752 of 24,276 topics). This Neuroscience is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Neuroscience
Topic details
Total words: 76,154
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score18 analyzed articles76.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst