Topic summary
79% 24 analyzed articles/videos 13,662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 5,146 hits . Analysis detected 39,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,697 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,719 of 22,261 topics). This Nasa is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Nasa
Topic details
Total words: 62,697
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score24 analyzed articles62.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst