Topic summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naruto Movie Adaptation results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,608 of 23,407 topics). This Naruto Movie Adaptation is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Naruto Movie Adaptation
Topic details
Total words: 2,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.2%12.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos