Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Musical Theatre results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 407 hits. Analysis detected 4,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,816 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (7,789 of 22,229 topics). This Musical Theatre is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Musical Theatre
Topic details
Total words: 3,816
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos