Topic summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos1,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Music Performance results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 2,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,108 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (17,662 of 24,108 topics). This Music Performance is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Music Performance
Topic details
Total words: 5,108
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.1%12.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos