Author summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Gonzalez results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 563 hits . Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,423 of 9,471 authors). This Joseph Gonzalez is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Joseph Gonzalez
Author details
Total words: 4,052
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.9% 13.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst