Topic summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mlb Trade Rumors results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 3,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,200 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (7,319 of 24,545 topics). This Mlb Trade Rumors is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Mlb Trade Rumors
Topic details
Total words: 3,200
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos