Topic summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minister results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ad Hominem, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 2,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (12,389 of 24,718 topics). This Minister is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Minister
Topic details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos