Topic summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Microsoft Outlook results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Slippery Slope , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 383 hits . Analysis detected 1,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,763 of 24,276 topics). This Microsoft Outlook is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Microsoft Outlook
Topic details
Total words: 1,244
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.7% percentile 8.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.8% 30.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 23.9% 23.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 29.3% 29.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst